The Triglyph Dilemma

Originally posted March 11, 2021

One of the great mysteries of Greek architecture which defies rational explanation is something known as the Triglyph Dilemma. This occurred when the Greeks, insisting upon placing each triglyph (the three bar medallion) directly above each column, also insisted on having them meet at each corner. This resulted in an awkward condition where the column was forced outward at the corner to mediate between the two conflicting demands.

This “kicking out” of the column at the corner and the subsequent adjustment along the length of the entablature is one of the hallmarks of the “correct” classical interpretation of the orders.  It is one of the things that gives a properly conceived classical building “character.”  Even when the trigyph is not present, as in the Corinthian or Ionic order, this adjusted corner condition is present.

What is it about this “adjustment” or this desire to adhere to two conflicting conditions that adds such charm to an edifice? Is it the aspiration of perfection rendered through the imperfection of unique circumstance? If so, is that the reason Mount Vernon with its slightly asymmetrical arrangement of windows in its center façade has so much more charm than the platonic Monticello?

Like a beautiful but imperfect face that focuses our attention on more than simple perfection, asymmetry reveals a human condition, and the trace of life’s contradictions.